扒车喵The United States, Japan and France are prodding their companies to rely less on China to make the world’s smartphones,drugs and other products. But even after the coronavirus derailed trade, few want to leave China’s skilled workforce andefficient suppliers of raw materials to move to other countriesDisruptions from the pandemic, on top of the U.S. -Chinese tariffwar, fueled warnings that relying too much on China leaves global companies vulnerable to costly breakdowns in the event of disasters or political conflict.Drug makers stand out as one industry that is trying to reduce reliance on Chinese suppliers by setting up sources of rawmaterials in the United States and Europe But consumer electronics, medical devices and other industries are sticking with China.”I don’t know of a single company right now that is moving ahead with any plans to move, said Harley Seyedin, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in South China的行China’s explosive rise as the world’s low-cost factory helped to hold down consumer prices and boosted Western corporate profits. But it has fueled political tension over lost American and European blue collar jobs. Governments and industryconsultants fret that dependence on China can be a threat to supply chains and possibly national security.Chinese factories assemble most of the world’s smartphones and consumer electronics and growing share of medical equipment, industrial robots and other high-tech goods. This country is a dominant supplier of vitamin C and ingredients forantibiotics and other medicines. The ruling Communist Party has spent two decades building ports, railways, telecom networksand other facilities that are regarded as among the world’s best.”China still offers an unparalleled supply chain for any industry,”said Jit Lim of Alvarez Marsal, a management ponsulting firm.Philip Richardson, who man ufactures loudspeakers in Panyu, near Hong Kong, said he has looked at Vietnam and other countries. But he said while their wages might be as low as 60% of China’s, the savings will be eaten up by the cost of givingup his network of Chinese suppliers.”We gave it consideration for about a minute, and it doesn’t make sense, said Richardson, who has worked in China for22 years. “When you buy magnets, now you have to pay for transportation and customs duties into other countries, whereasin China we just buy the magnets and they are shipping to us.”President Donald Trump took office i217 promising tobring back our.”The next years’ tariff hikes on goods from China in a fight over technology and trade prompted some exporters to shift production. But changes were small. Most went to other developing countries.The pandemic has raised political pressure for companies to move.
美国、日本和法国正在敦促他们的公司减少对中国的依赖,以制造世界上的智能手机、药品和其他产品,但即使在冠状病毒导致贸易脱轨之后,也很少有人愿意离开中国的熟练劳动力和高效的原材料供应商,转移到其它国家。疫情带来的干扰,加上中美关税战,加剧了这样的警告:过于依赖中国会使全球企业在发生灾害或政治冲突时容易出现代价高昂的失败。制药公司通过在美国和欧洲建立原材料源,试图减少对中国供应商的依赖,但消费电子、医疗设备和其他行业都在坚持与中国合作。华南美国商会(American Chamber of Cammerce in South China)会长哈利塞耶丁表示:“我没听说过目前有哪家公司正在推无任何搬迁计划。”中国作为世界低成本工厂的爆炸性崛起,有助于压低消费者价格,并提升西方企业利润,但这也加剧了美国和欧洲蓝领工作岗位流失的政治紧张,各国政府和行业顾问担心,对中国的依赖可能会对供应链和可能的国家安全构成威胁。中国的工厂组装了世界上大部分的智能手机和消费类电子产品,在医疗设备、工业机器人和其他高科技产品中的份额也越来越大,这个国家是维生素C和抗生素及其他药品原料的主要供应商。中国花了20年时间建设了港口、铁路、电信网络和其他设施,这些设施被认为是世界上最好的。中国为任何行业提供了无与伦比的供应链。管理咨询公司 Alvarez& MarsalJ说,他已经考察了越南和其他国家但他说,虽然他们的工资可能低至中国的60%,但是节省下来的钱将被放弃他的中国供应商网络的成本所吞噬。我们考虑了大约一分钟,这没有任何意义,”在中国工作了22年的理查森说”当你购买磁铁时,你必须支付进入其他国家的运输费用和关税,而在中国,我们只需购买磁铁,它们就会运到我们这里。唐纳德·特朗普总统于2017年就职,承诺“恢复我们的就业机会”,第二年,由于技术和贸易争端,中国商品关税上调,促使一些出口商转移生产,但是总体变化很小,大多数都流向了其他发展中国家。这场流行病大大提高了企业转移的政治压力。
The Japanese government, which sees China as a strategic rival, is offering 220 billion yen ($2 billion) to companies that move production to Japan in a virus aid package announced in April. It offers 23.5 billion yen ($220 million) for Japanese companies in China to move to other countriesThe tariff war prompted concern about China’s dominance as a supplier of active pharmaceutical ingredients, or APIs, used in antibiotics and vitamins. Some American commentators warned Beijing might retaliate by withholding APIs, though was there no sign that happened.”There will be an increase in the repatriation of national drug supply chains and the re-establishment of national strategic manufacturing capabilities for key drugs,”Sakshi Sikka, who follows the industry for Fitch Solutions, said in an email.In May, the U.S. government awarded a contract worth up to $812 million over years to Phlow Corp., a Virginia companyset up to insure against drug shortages by producing ingredien ts and generics.In Europe, French drugmaker Sanofi SA is setting up an API supplier to reduce reliance on China. Sanofi says the companywill be the No. global producer, with annual sales of billion euros by 2022.India and Indonesia have announced plans to increase their own production of pharmaceutical raw materials.Those changes are politically driven and will push up costs, while China’s dominance as a global supplier is unlikely tochange in the near future, according to Fitch’s SikkaCompanies including Nike Inc. that used to make shoes, furniture, clothes and other low-margin goods in China have been migrating for a decade to Southeast Asia, Africa and other economies in search of cheaper labor.For higher-end shoes, however, U.S. import duties would have to rise even further before sites such as Ethiopia or Southeast Asia can compete with experienced Chinese workers and flexible suppliers, said Robert Gwynne, who produces women’s shoes for brands including Steve Madden in Dongguan, near Hong Kong”All my clients say, we have to diversify,” said Gwynne. But when shown costs in other countries, “90% take the China”scenario.
日本政府视中国为战略竞争对手,在4月宣布的病毒援助计划中,向那些将生产转移到日本的公司提供2200亿日元(20亿美元)的援助,它为在华日企提供235亿日元(2.2亿美元)的援助,以帮助它们转移到其他国家。关税战引发了人们对中国作为抗生素和维生素中使用的活性药物成分(或称原料药)供应商,占据主导地位的担忧,一些美国评论员警告说,北京可能会通过扣留原料药进行报复,尽管没有迹象表明发生了这种情况。国家药品供应链的回流和关键药品的国家战略制造能力的重建将会增加,”为Fitch Soluticns跟踪行业的 Sikka在一封电子邮件中说。5月,美国政府将一份价值高达8.12亿美元的10年合同授予了弗吉尼亚州的 Phlow公司,该公司成立的目的是通过生产原料药和仿制药来防止药品短缺。在欧洲,法国制药商赛诺菲正在成立一家原料药供应商,以减少对中国的依赖,赛诺菲表示,到2022年,该公司将成为全球第二大生产商,年销售额将达到10亿欧元。印度和印尼已经宣布计划增加自己的医药原料生产。惠誉的 Sikka称,这些变化是由政治因素驱动的,将推高成本,而中国作为全球供应商的主导地位在短期内不太可能改变。包括耐克公司在内,过去在中国生产鞋子、家具、服装和其他低利润商品的公司,十年来一直在向东南亚、非洲和其他经济体迁移,以寻求更便宜的劳动力。然而,对于更高端的鞋子来说,美国的进口关税必须进一步提高,埃塞俄比亚或东南亚等地的工厂才能与经验丰富的中国工人和灵活的供应商竞争, Robert Gwynne说,他在香港附近的东莞为包括史蒂夫·马登在内的品牌生产女鞋。我所有的客户都说,我们必须多样化,”Gwynne说,但当向他们展示其他国家的成本时,90%的人都会选择中国方案
Companies also increasingly are tied to China by the appeal of its 1.3 billion consumers at a time when the West’s spending growth is anemic.Makers of automobiles and higher-value goods are spending billions of dollars to expand Chinese production. As the economy reopened, Volkswagen AG said in May it would spend 2 billion euros ($2.2 billion)to buy control of its Chinese electricvehicle venture and a controlling stake in a battery producer.Instead of using China to export, “now a lot of people are producing local for local, “said Lim.Only 11% of companies that responded to a survey by the European unx Chamber of Commerce in China said they were”considering shifting investment to other countries,” down from15% last yearSome are leaving to cut labor costs, but the rest”are really committed to China,” said a chamber vice president, Charlotte Roule.Moving factories or finding non-Chinese suppliers to reduce the risk of disruption”means further investment, “RoulesaidWho is going to pay for thatCharles M. Hubbs, founder of Premier Guard, which makes surgical gowns masks and other medical devices in China, said heis gearing up to produce face masks in Mississippi to avoid problems with shipping But he said such an approach won’twork once the pandemic ends and prices fall back to normal.”You can afford it now. People are paying $12 for an isolation gown, said Hubbs, who has worked in China since the late1980s. “But when COVID is over you’re going to go back to $3 or $4.”Many companies already have pursued a “China plus one” strategy in Asia over the past decade. They set up factories inSoutheast Asia to serve other markets or insure against disruption in China even if that raised their costs.But as China lifted anti-disease controls on business in March, other Asian economies shut down, forcing companies to shift work back to Chinese factories, which are working overtime to make up the shortfall, said Seyedin.Some U.S. and other leaders are talking about possible tax breaks or other incentives to lure companies home. Trump has threatened to raise taxes on American companies that move from China to any other country but the U nited States.Even if tax breaks or subsidies go ahead, com panies face the costs of setting upa factory in unfamiliar territory, training rookie employees, finding suppliers and possible disruption to customer relations, said Alvarez Marsal’s Lim.”Shifting is not free,” he said.
在西方消费增长乏力之际,中国13亿消费者的吸引力也使得企业越来越依赖中国。汽车和高附加值商品制造商正斥资数十亿美元扩大中国生产,随着经济复苏,大众汽车今年5月表示,将斥资20亿欧元(合22亿美元),收购其中国电动汽车合资企业的控股权,以及一家电池生产商的控股权利姆说,“现在很多人不再利用中国出口产品,而是生产本地产品。”对中国欧盟商会的一项调查作出回应的公司中,只有11%的公司表示他们“正在考虑将投资转移到其他国家”,低于去年的15%美国商会副会长夏洛特·劳尔表示,一些企业离开中国是为了削减劳动力成本,但其余企业“确实致力于中国市场”。劳尔表示,搬迁工厂或寻找非中国供应商以降低终端风险“意味着进一步投资”,“谁来为此买单?在中国生产手术服、口罩和其他医疗设备的 Premier Guard公司的创始人查尔斯·M·哈布斯说,他正在密西西比州加紧生产口罩,以避免出现运输问题,但是他说,一旦大流行结束,价格回落到正常水平,这种方法就不会奏效。“现在还能顶得住,人们花12美元买一件隔离服,”上世纪80年代末开始在中国工作的哈布斯表示“但是当新冠疫情结束后价格将会回落3或4美元。过去10年,许多公司在亚洲已经实施“中国+1”战略,他们在东南亚设立工厂,为其他市场服务,或者为中国市场终端提供保险,即使这会提高他们的成本。但塞耶丁表示,随着中国在3月份解除对企业的防疫管制,而其它亚洲经济体纷纷停工关闭,迫使企业将工作转回中国工厂,这些工厂正在加班加点地弥补缺口。一些美国和其他国家的领导人正在讨论可能的税收减免或其他激励措施,以吸引企业回国,特朗普曾威胁要对从中国转移到除美国以外的任何其他国家的美国公司加税即使税收减免或补贴继续进行,企业也面临着在不熟悉的领域建立工厂、培训新员工、寻找供应商以及可能破坏客户关系的成本,奥迈企业顾问公司的利姆说。他表示:“转移不是免费的。”
**************国外网友评论翻译******************
GoGet Parked
Companies have only one thing in mind, profits. It has no nationalistic agenda unless it it articially put in placed. Democracy and free market advocates would have you believe that it is only right for markets to be left to decide for what isright or wrong. But they are largely wrong. Blind pursuit of profits is wrong. Western companies are driven by the need to seek profits regardless of social and environmental cost. They think only about profits Last thing we need is to creditthem for seeking profits even though politics criticises them for doing so.
企业只考虑一件事,利润,它没有民族主义,除非被人为干预,民主和自由市场的倡导者会让你相信,只有让市场来决定什么是对的,什么是错的,但他们基本上都错了。盲目追求利润是错误的,西方企业的驱动力是追求利润,而不顾社会和环境成本,他们只考虑利润,我们最不需要的就是赞扬他们谋取利润,即使政治批评他们这样做。
Gaoran
Especially its supply chain, nothing compares. Which country has the infrastructure, work force and capacity necessary to
set up shop, produce goods AND ship them to wherever in whatever quantity? Motherfucking China that’s who. I do believe that western companies and governments would jump at the chance to leave China to leave elsewhere, but they will alwaysruninto problems in either capacity, infrastructure or just an inadequate work force that won’t ensure quality of the products and services they provide like we do. Vietnam has com parable population in terms of education and infrastructure,but they are “just” a country of 1o0 million people (vietnam is fucking huge by all metrics, but it STILL pales in comparison to their big brother up north). They can only meet the world’s demand to such an extent with the existing means theyhave before they get so far. SEA? Good luck having try to ship everything between either multiple islands or rugged backcountry. The only country that has some potential here is India. They have the territory and population to facilitate beingthe world’s next factory. Only their infrastructure and even basic education of a lot of their people are still decades behind, but those are things that can be changed and developed, albeit over multiple decades. Both India and China should count themselves blessed with being located in such geographical strategic locations, with the natural geographic featuresthey have… And there is A SHITLOAD of money that can be made here, as long as business doesn’t interrupted by somethinglike… Lets say a war.
尤其是中国的供应链,没有那个国家能与之相比,哪个国家有必要的基础设施、劳动力和能力来建立工厂生产商品,可以无论数量多少都可以运送到任何地方?只有他妈的中国。我确实相信西方公司和政府会抓住机会离开中国去其他地方,但他们总会遇到产能、基础设施或者劳动力不足的问题,无法像中国一样确保他们提供的产品和服务的质量。就教育和基础设施而言,越南的人口数量与美国相当,但他们“只是”一个拥有1亿人口的国家(从各方面来看,越南都非常庞大,但与他们在北方老大哥相比仍然相形见绌)他们在达到目标之前,只能用现有的手段在一定程度上满足世界的需求。海运?运气好的话,你可以尝试在多个岛屿崎岖的偏远地区之间搞搞运输试试。这里唯一有潜力的国家是印度,他们有足够的领土和人口来成为下一个世界工厂,但是他们的基础设施,甚至许多人的基础教育仍然落后几十年,尽管这些都是可以改变和发展的,但那需要几十年的时间!印度和中国都应该庆幸自己处于这样的地理战略位置,拥有天然的地理优势而且只要生意不被中断比如说战争之类的东西打断,这里有大把钱可赚。
Gaoran
We all know who would benefit the most from a conflict between the world’s largest economy and world’s what-could-potentially-be the largest economy. Whoever becomes the largest, they don’t like either of us to be more well-off than they are.
我们都知道,如果全球最大经济体与有可能成为全球最大经济体的全球经济体发生冲突,对谁最有利,无论谁成为最大的经济体,他们都不希望我们中的任何一个比他们更富裕。
Timmy
As for those you hear shouting for their countries to shift trade away from China and use countries such as India, Indonesia and Vietnam etc as manufacturing replacements instead, what they fail to comprehend is that it took China 42 YeARS todevelop their manufacturing industries in to what they are now, and to believe that other much smaller and less developed economies will have the immediate capacity to replicate what China has taken decades to achieve is completely laughable. letalone satisfy the west RIGHT NOW which is what they want.Building a SIN GLE mass production factory would take years of planning and construction, let alone trying to replicate China’s entire manufacturing base which probably has tens of thousands of factories. Then there’s the training of non skilled workers, skilled workers, managers, supervisors ete to run a factory which can take another several years. Your country would then also need to build a massive transportation and logistical framework to actually process and ship all those goods to the west. That means reliable highways, ports, airports, shipping vessels, aircraft, transportation workers etc. Howmuch money would one of these non China governments need to pay for all this? Then you need a strong legal and financial system to actually make international transactions possible and reliable. How many years would it take to write all these Iaws and then try and pass them through the legal and parliamentary system?These are only a handful of the hundreds of potential variables that need to be considered for a country who wants to replace China’ in manufacturing. It took China morethan 40 years to set all this infrastructure up and allow the system to develop and mature. How long would it take othercountries?
至于那些你听到的要求他们的国家把贸易从中国转移出去,用印度、印度尼西亚和越南等国家作为制造业替代品的呼声,他们没能理解的是,中国花了42年的时间才把他们的制造业发展成现在这个样子,并且相信其他规模小得多、欠发达的经济体会立即有能力复制中国花了几十年才取得的成就,这完全是可笑的,更不用说满足西方现在的需求了。建立一个单一的大规模生产工厂需要多年的规划和建设,更不用说试图复制中国的整个制造业基地,这个基地可能有数万家工厂,然后是对非熟练工人、熟练工人、经理、管理人员等的培训,这些培训可能需要几年的时间才能完成然后,你的国家还需要建立一个庞大的运输和物流框架,以实际加工和运输所有这些货物到西方,这意味着可靠的高速公路、港口、机场、船舶、飞机运输工人等。这些国家的政府需要为此支付多少钱?然后,你需要一个强大的法律和金融体系,使国际交易成为可能且可靠,你需要多少年才能撰写完成所有这些法律,然后通过这些法律,又需要多少年?对于一个“希望在制造业方面取代中国”的国家来说,这些只是需要考虑的数百个潜在变量中的一小部分。中国花了40多年的时间来建立这些基础设施,使这个系统得以发展和成熟,其他国家需要多长时间?
FlaviusAetius451
Funny how capitalism is so reliant on evil communism to man ufacture everything for them.
有趣的是,资本主义如此依赖为他们制造一切。
FourLastSongs
Shocked
震惊
Wuixa
What was tim apple saying before?”The products we do require advanced tooling. In the United States, I am not sure our tooling engineers can fill aroom.In China, you can fill multiple football fields,”This ain’t even a matter of”quantity has quality all of it’s own”, China’s top unis for mech engineering ain’t sloucheWould say the above stands for pretty much every single field. Hell, only reason the yanks are still on top with AI is because really intelligent but really fucking stupid Chinese people go overseas to work. What a disgusting disgraceBuild the wall. Stop the brain drain. MCGA
苹果的蒂姆·库克之前是怎么说的来着?我们的产品需要先进的模具,在美国,我不确定我们的模具工程师能否填满一个房间,但在中国,你可以填满多个足球场这甚至不是量变引起质变”的问题,中国顶尖的机械工程师可不是白瞎的。上面这篇文章描述的情况几乎代表了所有领域的状况,麻蛋,美国在人工智能方面仍处于领先地位的唯一原因是,非常聪明但筑墙,阻止人才流失,MCGA(让中国再次伟大)许私自的行为是非常非常愚蠢的中国人去海外工作了,真是恶心的耻辱
lilliputian
Lol walls don’t work. You just need to make China more enticing than the US, which both China and the US are doing.
LOL,墙是没用的,你只需要让中国比美国更有诱惑力,中国和美国都在做
Girl in a whirl
Always cracks me up when I see liberals talking about, “We need to stop relying on goods from China wah wahwah. “I’m justlike, soooo, are you ready for socialism then Because that’s the only way to stop capitalists from deciding where yourconsumer goods get produced. Also it would take years of reorganizing society before we could make all our own stuff againin the US. These fools have no idea how the world works.
当我看到自由主义者谈论我们需要停止依赖来自中国的商品的时候,我总是笑得合不拢嘴。我只是想,所以,你们准备好迎接社会主义了吗?因为这是阻止资本家决定你的消费品在哪里生产的唯一方法。此外,在美国,我们还需要花费数年时间来重组社会,才能重新制造自己的东西。这些白痴根本不知道这个世界是怎么运作的。
Gaoran
Or even better, the ones who shout to “just”move their factories or production to some poor af country, they could”just”produce the same goods, right? mean that’s how this capitalism thing works, right?I am paying for it, so I have all the POWAH! Doesn’t matter if I put this factory in the middle of some sandbox, there will probably be people out there whowill assemble my $1400 Macbook for a few cents, no? That’ll teach China! Just move EVERYTHING to India, Africa or just some fucking desert. We will get our laptops and shizz from there, from now on!
更有甚者,那些喊着要就把工厂或生产搬到某个贫穷非洲国家的人,他们可以就生产同样的商品,对吧?资本主义这玩意不就这么回事吗,是吧?我在为它付钱,所以我说了算!如果我把这个工厂迁到在某个沙漠旮旯也无所谓,也许会有人为了几毛钱组装我1400美元的Madook,不是吗?给中国一个教训!只要把所有东西都搬到印度,非洲或者那个该死的沙漠就行了!我们将从那里获得我们的笔记本电脑和鞋子,赶紧的吧!
Tall-sta
I’m convinced that global human civilization faces collapse during this century (the argument was developed by https: //en.wikipedia. org/wiki/The_Limits_to_Growth in 1972 based on peak resource extraction)unless China can save humanity in timewith some combination of fusion energy, materials science, and digital consumer technology. Given how strong China’s enemies are, I’m not holding my breath and am making investments in natural resources.
我确信全球人类文明在本世纪面临崩溃(这一理论基于资源开采达到峰值维基百科:197年的《增长的极限》),除非中国能及时用核聚变能源、材料科学和数字消费技术的某种组合来及时拯救人类,鉴于中国的敌人的强大,我对他们进行自然资源方面的投资不抱任何希望。
jorvis_nonof
I agree that suburbs are environmentally a big problem, but newer construction techniques, including well-insulated wallsand windows, can mitigate some of this, and good road design can also minimise the traffic problem.The issue here is that there are many Chinese professionals currently willing to move to other countries so that they canhave detached, single-family homes and own multiple cars -so they’re going to have these when they move to another country anyways. It’s preferable to keep them in China. The environmental impact will be lessened by keeping them in China because the government can enforce more efficient construction standards for detached single-family homes.
我同意郊区独户住宅在环境上是个大问题,但新的建筑技术,包括隔热性能好的墙体和窗户,可以缓解一些问题,好的道路设计也可以将交通问题降到最低。问题是,目前有很多中国的专业人士愿意移居到其他国家,这样他们就可以拥有独立的单户住宅,并拥有多辆汽车,他们移居到其他国家时无论如何都会拥有这些。最好是把他们留在中国,对环境的影响会减少,因为政府可以对独立的单户住宅执行更有效的建筑标准。
ghost-zz
Of course they don’t. They outsourced to China in the first place because those very same companies didn’t want to pay totrain future staff.Why would those companies want to move to another country to pay and train staff??
这些公司不会愿意离开中国的,他们外包给中国是因为这些公司不想花钱培训未来的员工。为什么这些公司想要搬到另一个国家支付并培训员工呢?
lost man wants_soda
For more money.If cost of retraining is less than pay difference than it makes sense to retrainCompanies won’t leave if they lose an economic advantage by leaving China. Generally that advantage is speed and ease ofbusiness.More and more that advantage is innovation, where believe China wants to be.
The pioneer of the next industrial revolution and becoming an advanced economy.
为了赚更多的钱。如果再培训的成本低于薪酬差距,那么再培训就有意义了。如果企业因为离开中国而失去了经济优势,它们是不会离开的,一般来说,这种优势是速度和便捷的业务来往。这种优势越来越多地体现在创新上,我相信这是中国想要达到的。中国是下一次工业革命的先驱,正在成为一个先进的经济体。
Spacearrowpark
They don’t realize that ship sailed decades ago and it’s China, not the US, who gets to dictate these terms
他们没有意识到这艘船几十年前就开航了,而且是中国,不是美国,来决定航向。
stingerboast
but but india is ready. oh wait, lets stop mocking them.but but how about Vietnam? (er many investment were done by Chinese themselves)have you heard of Made in China Send to vietnam, VIola! it is now Made in Vietnam^
但是,但是人家印度已经准备好了,哦等等,别再嘲笑他们了。但是越南呢?(许多都是中国人自己投资的)你听说过所谓“中国制造”(运到越南),精彩不!现在是“越南制造
Alfyn
My Apple charger says’Assembled in Vietnam’! China is finished!”
“我的苹果充电器上写着“越南组装′!”中国完蛋了!
BeefyMongol
China’s workforce is not only good in quantity but quality as well. Their infrastructures are also able to support massivescale production.
中国的劳动力不仅数量多,质量也很好,他们的基础设施也能够支持大规模生产。
notnormal44
reminds me of a former comment from a sino comrade (it was so good I had to save it):The ‘Boycott China’ campaign right now has become completely hysterical and extremely feverish amongst the masses in thewest and many other countries. These completely ignorant people somehow believe that by boycotting the Chinese products they see in their stores they will be hurting’ the Chinese government and ‘sticking it to the CCP’, when in fact almost allthe made in China products they see have no connection to the Chinese government whatsoever. Even if a ‘boycott China’campaign succeeded,it’ s main impact wouldnt’ be on the Chinese government,it’ s main blow would be to Chinese businesses and employees who have no political or financial connection to the Chinese government.This is further proof that the nonsense moniker ‘we don’t hate the Chinese people, only the Chinese government’is complete and utter bullshit. It has always been about sinophobia and veiled racism as they aim to collectively punish all Chinaand all Chinese people as a whole.take for example the completely idiotic decision by the UK government to backtrack on the Huawei 5G deal, ‘in order to punish the Chinese government for covering up the virus and allowing it to spread.’Wel Huawei is NOT owned by the Chinese government, how is banning them going to hurt the Chinese government? This line of reasoning makes no sense. The moreplausible explanation is that the UK government is simply gripped by racist sinophobia and wants to attack anything Chinese.
这让我想起了之前某位中国“同志”的评论(他说的太好了,我保存了下来)现在的“抵制中国”运动已经变得完全歇斯底里,在西方和许多其他国家的群众中极度狂热。这些完全无知的人认为,抵制他们在商店里看到的中国产品,他们能伤害”中国政府,“向中国施压”,而事实上,他们看到的几乎所有中国制造的产品都与中国政府没有任何关系。即使“抵制中国”运动成功了,它的主要影响也不会是中国政府,它的主要打击将是普通的中国企业和雇员,他们与中国政府没有任何政治或经济上的联系。这进一步证明了“我们不恨中国人民,只恨中国政府”这个无稽之谈完全是胡说八道,它从始至终就是恐怖主义和隐蔽的种族主义,因为他们的目的是共同惩罚所有中国人,把所有中国人作为一个整体。例如,英国政府决定放弃华为5G交易,这完全是一个愚蠢的决定,“目的是惩罚中国许其传播。”好吧,华为不是中国政府所有,禁止他们怎么会伤害中国政府?这种推理是没有道理的,更合理的解释是,英国政府只是被种族主义、恐华症所困,意图攻击所有中国人。
UnableSwing
yeah so here is the true facts behind a lot of the political grandstanding and clickbait headlines
是的,这就是许多政客哗众取宠,头条新闻骗流量的标题背后的真实情况。
jorvis_nonof
The main reasons that professionals leave China areWages are still too low for the long working hours that are demanded of professionals. Working hours must be limited below 50 per week. 9-9-6 must be abolished. What’s the point of making a lot of money if your employer doesn’t give you any free time to enjoy any of it?Housing fit for professionals is lackluster for the price, compared to offerings for the same level of salary in foreigncountries. 500,000 CHF buys you a very decent house within commuting distance of major cities in Europe, Australia, Canadaor the USA. 500,000 CHF buys you a crappy apartment in China’s major citiesChina needs more suburbs with detached homes.
专业人员离开中国的主要原因是,对于专业人员所要求的长时间工作来说,工资仍然太低。必须将工作时间限制在每周50小时以下,必须废除朝九晚六的工作制,如果你的雇主不给你任何自由的时间来享受这些钱,那么赚那么多钱有什么意义?与国外同等工资水平的住房相比,适合专业人士居住的住房价格不忍直视,50万可以买到一栋非常体面的房子,距离欧洲、澳大利亚、加拿大或美国的主要城市都很近,50万只能在中国的主要城市买到一套破烂的公寓。水印译文可中国需要更多的郊区独立屋。
overbeb
Your conclusion of building suburbs is absolutely the wrong one. Suburbs of single family homes are terribly inefficientand cause all kinds of environmental/ecological harms. They also make mass transportation much harder leading to more automobile usage which also causes environmental damage.
你关于建造郊区独立屋的结论绝对是错误的,郊区独户住宅的效率极其低下,造成各种环境生态危害,它们也使大众运输更加困难,导致更多的使用汽车,也造成环境破坏。
