China and India are both great and ancient countries. Similarly, both countries were invaded or colonized by Western bandits.
There's an old saying in China: "there's no making without breaking". Countries or civilizations like China and India have existed for too long. Their ancient glory has long disappeared. When Western powers rise, they are old, sick, rotten and even dying. Their old bodies won't work in the new era. They need fresh blood to survive.
中国有句老话：“There's no making without breaking”(不破不立)”, 像中国和印度这样的国家或文明，他们存在的时间太久了，他们古老的荣耀早已消逝，当西方列强崛起时，他们已经老了，生病了，腐烂了，甚至奄奄一息。他们旧的身体在新时代根本行不通，他们需要新鲜血液才能生存。
Emperors, nobles or higher castes, landlords, these are vested interests. These people are greedy and weak. They control the country but refuse to change.
Throughout the 20th century, China has completely destroyed itself from the outside to the inside through fire and blood. She has paid the price, lost almost everything, and almost destroyed her ancient culture. China has been reborn and is now young and healthy.
India tried to save itself, bought a new dress called "democracy" and imitated the western system brought by the colonists, but her heart was still old. The nobility and landlords still existed. India was deeply trapped by these parasites and thousands of years of tradition and culture. India is still old, but China has been reborn.
This is because the revolutionaries represented by Mao Zedong have done three major things in the field of ideology and culture:
1. Deprive feudal bureaucrats and bourgeois intellectuals of their privileges and break the monopoly of public opinion;
2. Eliminate the original local clan forces and warlord forces in China, and realize centralization of power;
3. The capital and bureaucratic interest groups within China have been eliminated.
He gives the people the greatest power: the government takes serving the people as its purpose, and the people are the masters of history.
He taught the Chinese that if anyone dares to whip you, whether he is a government official, a superior, a rich man, a monk, an imam, asachalya or a guru, you must fight back bravely! Don't let them ride on your head again.
Lu Xun, the flag bearer of China's new culture, said that Chinese people always like to reconcile and compromise. For example, if you say that the room is too dark, you must open a window here. Everyone must not allow it. But if you want to tear down the roof, they will come to reconcile and are willing to open windows. Without more drastic proposals, they would not even carry out peaceful reforms.
Mao Zedong said that correction must be excessive, but correction cannot be. That is to say, in order to correct mistakes, we must go beyond the appropriate limits, otherwise mistakes cannot be corrected. The original problems of old China have gone deep into the bone marrow, and we must use powerful drugs to treat them according to their symptoms.
Chairman Mao just wanted the Chinese people to stand up mentally and physically, not to kneel like slaves, not to land on all fours like animals.
India needs such a great man to thoroughly reform its old culture in order to be reborn. So, wake up, Indian brothers, don't be bound by the old culture, don't be fooled by religion.
When Indians stand up and kill these demons, you will be liberated to seriously pursue truth and goodness. Until then, China will continue to move forward, while India has no choice but to play with its thumb and pray in vain.
In short, you must get rid of old culture (including religion), accept rational and humanistic values, and realize that people are the Supreme God, and they can control their own destiny.
China's success is the success of the Chinese revolutionaries with Mao Zedong as the core. In fact, Mao Zedong is the most successful and successful leader in modern China. They laid the foundation for the establishment and development of new China:
• unified oral English; Teach people to speak Mandarin (I can't emphasize how important this is);
• since the late Ming Dynasty about 400 years ago, the complete political unity of the country has been realized for the first time in the form of a multi-ethnic state;
• win the strategic victory of the Korean War. The Korean War was a key test for the people's Republic of China, and it was also a year after the end of the civil war. People often forget that the Korean War has terrible similarities with the first Sino Japanese war. In fact, the year the Korean War ended in 1953 was only 60 years away from the Sino Japanese war.
The performance of new China in the war far exceeded anyone's expectations. The UN troops not only stopped crossing the Yalu River, but also were forced to withdraw across the whole of Korea, even across the Han River. This is the longest land withdrawal in American history. The first marine expeditionary force was forced to carry out the only land retreat in the history of the United States Marine Corps, a record that continues to this day.
• participate in the hegemony game of superpowers while maintaining independence. Although China has many weaknesses, in the struggle for global hegemony, China can resist the United States and the Soviet Union at the same time.
He led the Chinese people to end the Chinese civil war that lasted for half a century;
He built an army that could repel foreign invaders and end the century long humiliation since the Opium War;
He emphasized the role of women in society and promoted gender equality;
Under his leadership, China realized industrialization;
He knew the importance of education. Before Mao Zedong, the literacy rate was about 10%. After Mao Zedong, the literacy rate reached more than 70%;
Under his leadership, the life expectancy of the Chinese people has increased from 35 to 65;
Under the leadership of Mao Zedong, China has built its own nuclear deterrent force, and has become a member of the five permanent members of the United Nations;
Therefore, basically, for ordinary Chinese, if you were born before the founding of new China, you are likely to be illiterate and die in your thirties. After the Mao Zedong era, you may be literate, have a little money, and live to 60, so you have the opportunity to get married and have children, and watch them grow up to be self-sufficient. The new Chinese government has raised China's life expectancy, liberated women, implemented basic medical care and education, and laid the foundation for technological progress. This is a basic fact. Any discussion on Mao Zedong's great strategy and leadership should begin with recognizing this fact.
At the same time, China has been subject to the strictest embargo in the West. The US trade embargo against China shows that the US is the country with the most embargoes against China in history. There are 400 items on the embargo list, including fertilizers, wooden fishing boats, medicines and copper wires. In 1950, China was to a large extent a pre industrialized country, unable to manufacture these things at a reasonable cost, so they suffered a lot of suffering and bullying. The embargo even prevented Australia and Canada from selling food and fertilizer to China during natural disasters.
How is it mainly driven by the domestic party politics in the United States, which forces the U.S. government to take action. The White House also cooperates with U.S. allies, especially western Europe and Japan. This is why China now maintains a three-year Grain Reserve and is the only country in the world with a strategic pork reserve. Pigs: in China's strategic pork reserves, they absolutely believe that the United States will weaponize food.
Under such difficult conditions, without the work of Mao Zedong and other older generations, can China embark on the road of rapid economic growth after the reform and opening up? China's labor market may have an illiteracy rate of 80%, with an average life expectancy of 35 years. Women's feet are tied together and they can only stay at home. Without him, it is difficult to imagine the competitive advantage of China's labor force?
The Chinese people are very lucky to have such a leader, but what about the Indian people?
We can be sure that Gandhi has many advantages. He did some amazing and extraordinary things. For example, he has forever changed the face of radicalism and civil resistance, for which mankind should be deeply grateful to him. People call Mahatma "the great soul". But everyone has his own shortcomings. His shortcomings are disastrous for India.
First of all, I will state that I dislike Mohandas Gandhi for three reasons:
First, his role in the division of India led to bloodshed and forced millions of people to move from both sides of the border. People have been forced to leave their homes (especially in Punjab), forced to become homeless and starved.
I myself belong to a Punjab refugee family from Sialkot (West Punjab), so I can understand the pain my family suffered during the partition. Similarly, I can feel the innocent Muslims in eastern Punjab who are forced to move to the other side of the border. I am not saying that Janna or Nehru did not participate in the partition, but Gandhi should also be blamed because he did not stop the partition, even if he was able to do so.
Second, in 1947, Japan was far behind India in economy, but due to its own efforts, it reestablished its economic status. After 60 years of Nehru Gandhi rule, India gradually fell far behind Japan. Sadar has a vision for the development of the country. If sadar were the prime minister, we would neither have Nehru Gandhi's rule nor fall behind 60 years after independence. We will be far ahead of many developed countries.
Thirdly, and most importantly, his prejudice against revolutionaries such as bhagatsingh and subhashchandrabose. Everyone knows how influential and powerful these two great leaders were at that time, and Mohandas Gandhi was behind them. Therefore, in order to surpass them, Mohandas Gandhi killed these two great figures. No Punjab or Bangladeshi can forgive Gandhi's shameful behavior.
During the period of the Republic of China, Dai Jitao visited India to seek the support of India, but Gandhi advised China to give up resistance to Japan and let the Japanese slaughter at will. Anyway, China has so many people, and Japan can't kill them all. Sooner or later, the Japanese will be tired of killing them, and then they will quit.
Gandhi, as a national leader, said something like this, which really surprised people. He used the strategy of no resistance and let the Japanese army slaughter at will. Is this what a normal person can say? At that time, when these remarks came out, the national government understood that daobu was not in collusion. Gandhi's policy of non resistance is not suitable for China at all, nor can it bring any benefit to India.