扒车喵在国外知名论坛Quora上，一名印度网友问道：名列财富世界五百强榜单的企业中，有许多企业管理者是印度人，为什么中国人无法复制他们的成功？一名社会学家感到可笑又莫名其妙，针对这一现象回答了他的问题。
问题：许多印度人成为财富世界五百强的CEO，为什么像中国人他们不能复制印度人的成功？
Probably this question should be changed into :“why many indians choose to become CEOs of American F500 companies。”
我觉得这个问题应该改为“为什么这么多印度人才选择成为美国五百强公司的CEO而非回国效力？”
There are 115 Chinese companies，51 Japanese companies and 15 Korean companies in Fortune Global 500. Their CEOs are all Chinese，Japanese，and korean. Over a fifth of the CEOs are Chinese, and a third of the CEOs come from East Asia.
给你看一组数据，2021年《财富》世界500强中有115家中国公司、51家日本公司和15家韩国公司。他们各自的首席执行官都是本国人。在这个榜单中，有超过五分之一的首席执行官是中国人，三分之一的首席执行官来自东亚。
So I guess you are mainly concerned in American Companies, That’s Probably because only 7 Indian companies are listed in F500. almost nothing for the Indian CEOs working for.
所以我猜你所指的印度裔CEO是美国公司的，毕竟印度公司只有7家上榜。
So here is a question you shall ask instead. why do the great Indian CEOs have to work for the United States? Why aren’t the other Asian countries replicate this failure of the Indian Nation?
在了解这些之后，你应该问问自己，为什么这么多印度人才偏偏要为美国工作？为什么其他亚洲国家不像印度一样为美国输送人才？
In Japan, it’s a proud to work for Japanese stockholders, In China,It’s a shame to work for foreign stockholders.
我告诉你答案，因为在日本，为日本股东工作是一种骄傲，在中国，为外国资本背书是一种耻辱。
However here, you considered Indians’s working for foreign companies a success.If they start a business or are the leaders of an industry, it is understandable, and we should be proud of him, but the CEO in your mouth only serves foreign capital and is essentially an employment relationship.
然而，很可悲的是，你却认为为外国公司工作是一种成功。如果他们开创了一家企业或者是某个行业的领军人物那也情有可原，尚且值得我们为他骄傲，但你口中的CEO，他们只是为外国资本服务的，本质上是雇佣关系。
And I have to tell you, This view’s popularity in India is just the reason why the Indian enterprises fail.
现在你还认为印度人才为欧美国家的企业效力值得印度骄傲吗？而且说实话，持有这种观念正是印度企业做不起来的原因。
Chinese are mostly concerned to provide employement in their own country rather than serving in developed nations as a CEO which cannot attribute much in curbing unemployment in their own country.They will focus on whether they can let Chinese products go abroad and promote the development of their own economy.
中国的民族企业家关心的是能否为这个国家提供就业机会，能不能让中国的产品走出国门，能不能推动本国经济的发展。
Real strength of country depends on what its national achieve in their own country rather than counting 90–100 people success as national pride.
因此，一个国家的真正实力取决于这个民族在本国土地上取得的发展成就，而不应该靠几个人在别的国家取得一定地位来增强民族自豪感。
Indians have a slave mentality. Since time immemorial we have been enslaved, first by the Islamic rulers, and then by the Britishers, now it is the American tech giants. They love being slaves. They love working for American companies, because they don’t want to risk it, they play it safe, so instead of innovating, instead of creating anything new, they get settled for foreign companies, they start toiling for their American masters.
印度人有严重的奴隶心理。从远古时代起，我们就被奴役，先是被伊斯兰统治者奴役，然后是被英国人奴役，现在被美国科技与资本巨头奴役。他们喜欢做奴隶，宁愿为美国公司卖命工作，也不想冒风险创业，他们谨慎行事，并因此没有创新精神，难以创造任何新的东西，他们渐渐适应了外国公司的运作模式，心甘情愿的为他们的美国主人努力工作。
We might as well make a comparison. On the one hand, we send talents to Europe and the United States and work for them, while our country has not received any development dividends; On the other hand, relying on its innovation and originality, China has cultivated a large number of talents and created many influential enterprises, such as Huawei, Alibaba, Xiaomi and so on.
不妨做个对比，一方面，我们为欧美输送人才，为他们效力，而我们本国没得到一点发展的红利；另一方面，中国依靠其具有创新性和独创性，培养了大量人才，创建了诸多有影响力的企业，例如华为、阿里、小米等等。
Which of these is better for one’s country?, I ask you.
现在，我问你，哪一个模式对国家更有利呢？
